Joe Rogan | Chappelle's New Special Had 0% on Rotten Tomatoes JRE ClipsPublisert Måned sidenGanger 5 mill 95 k 3,1 mill NedlastingTaken from JRE #1346 w/Zuby:noplayer.info/show/ZmZ3Yk5mak5SVHc.htmlKommentarer marcusgeraintDag sidenI didnt find it funny. Not because I'm left right black white male female gay straight animal mineral film book car bicycle quiche lego. But because I just didnt find it funny. And that's fine.Trevor LambertDag sidenNever heard of this Zuby guy, but he's very well spoken and makes some insightful comments.Clown AroundDag sidenRotten tomatoes is LGBT biased.jefar amooseDag sidenIt was awesomemike newburyDag sidenThe guardian in the UK is an extreme left wing fake-newspapercalmbbaer2 dager sidenThis take seems off to me. Looking at Internet Archive, the earliest five critics (those reviewing the show in August) gave it negative reviews, ergo the 0%. At the time, the site claimed "no critical consensus" due to the small number of reviews. But the sixth (written on September 3), was positive, as were a number of subsequent September reviews, bring it up to 35%. There wasn't any Rotten Tomatoes conspiracy to "have it reviewed by five super-progressive critics." They just took what existed at that point in time. The site also changed its audience review system back in May to try to prevent invalid reviews. Although I'm not sure, that might explain why there were a few days between the show's debut and when the first audience reviews trickled in. (This change was in response to people "reviewing" Captain Marvel before it was released in theaters. Say what you will about the various controversies surrounding that film, but it does seem fair to prevent people who obviously haven't seen something from reviewing it.) You might then ask why those five critics disliked it - whether it was due to politics, sensitivity, or something else - but presenting it as some conspiracy to silence Chappelle misses the point completely and makes him out as some sort of victim rather than someone who made a show that some critics just didn't like. Diverging critical and audience scores are a fact of life - especially with the audience self-selecting to the extent they do on Netflix - not evidence that there's some organized effort to silence non-elitist opinion. Perhaps critics should better represent the opinion of the average moviegoer, but we've long known that they just don't. One last thing: Rotten Tomatoes reminds me of a scene from a 90s sitcom where a reviewer expresses disgust that their review should get boiled down to the position of a digit on one's hand, i.e., "thumbs up" or "thumbs down." If anyone can remember which show it was, they'll answer a question burning at the back of my mind for two decades....Son Of Songhai2 dager sidenI watched it several times. It was hilarious 😂Johann Ertz3 dager sidenRotten Tomatoes tried to take down Dave Chappelle. Instead, they took themselves down.Stephen James the 28th6 dager sidenLove Dave Chapelle’s work (especially his previous work(only his previous work) until this. I’ll be honest Joe, I’m heavily influenced by your speak and I do recall very recently you saying his most recent standup was a dive. I didn’t fully check it out (looks like I saved myself all kinds of minutes) because I just watched a snippet of the ‘racism’ thing. I was blown away at how poor in quality it was, especially given the bar he has set himself with his previous amazing work (to which has made us all lovers of his material). I found this, I ask a question (haven’t done the research): does he choose a location where there is deprevation regarding racism for example. I found myself thinking the crowd were bursting out in fits of tears yet I wasn’t. I get you pay a decent price for a ticket so enjoy as much as possible, to maximise your purchase. But man common, this in comparison to his other shows, in my opinion (call it naieve being an English white guy living in a very non-non-non racially scared place) trash. I love the guys work. I expected a whole lot better, I may have to watch the whole shabooom rather than judge after a brief clip but nah I can tell. Man must up his game. Bless him; maybe the dark times have got to his creativity. Keep up the great work Joe 👌💙Payback Gaming6 dager sidenNever forget the loud minority doesn't represent the silent majority! Let those 5 wannabe critics bark for attention! The silent majority loves chapelle and know how important he is for comedy!Zain Ashiq7 dager sidenRogan u gotta get Dave on if he’s up for itKawerau Woods8 dager sidenHollywood hates Chapelle because he walked away from their $50 million. They wanted another black caricature who they could control and he said no to that and their money. Since then the've been denigrating him. They says he flipped out at one of his comedy events. They say he's checked himself into a mental facility in South Africa. They say his comedy is homophobic, racist etc. They say he's comedy is failing and he's lost his touch... Yet Chapelle keeps winning and they hate that.richard crago8 dager sideneven the New York Times and Washington Post are full of bullshit, Joe ... it's so sad what's happened to corporate mediaCheez10 dager sidenUsually when I see obvious clickbait I avoid the video almost to a sense of boycotting because it's usually untruthful or stuffed with filler shit. imo.Jake Garcia_0z11 dager siden"KILL EVERYBODY AT SCHOOL?!?"HollyTree11 dager sidenWhile 32% on rotten tomatoes is a little too extreme, ultimately this was not Dave’s best work. Mostly lazy jokes and half hearted delivery. Bill Burr talked about similar stuff and he did a great job - got a 87% on rotten tomatoes. Most critics don’t shit on something just because they don’t agree with it, they’re gauging a lot of factors.Stephen Croteau14 dager sidenThere should be a news network with half left wing journalists and half right wing journalists (not far right or far left, as balanced and reasonable as possible). They definitely need to be as unbiased in their reporting as possible but that doesn't matter as much because my idea is to send two reporters, one from each side, and send them both to cover the same story getting as many different opinions as possible and then sitting down with each other and discussing, not what they think, but what the story is and the different opinions that each side has in the debate. The best way to properly inform someone is to give them all the important information (not your opinions) and let them work it out for themselves. Inform them of where a bias may be and they will adjust their outcomes accordingly. I say people are stupid, but we're just mostly stupid, there are still intelligent people in the world and they need to be properly informed to, in turn, inform the stupid among them.Ed Kendrick14 dager sidenRTMichael McNeill14 dager sidenThe Washington Post & The New York Times are reliable sources?Kerry Boytzun15 dager sidenJoe wants to find someone with an accurate analysis of the human condition. Michael Tsarion delves into the psychology and philosophy of the people behind the curtain so to speak, from present day to ancient history.zendogbreath15 dager sidenJoe Rogan, please put Del Bigtree on with Peter Hotez.ETX Sports15 dager sidenLolJ G15 dager sidenJoe you are the guy.Nico DeGregorio16 dager sidenA Liberal and a Conservative Debate Sticks and Stones: noplayer.info/show/LW5ZbGFMcEh4dE0.htmlJaniter Inadrum16 dager sidenWowJaniter Inadrum16 dager sidenDid that guy just say that he thought CNN was unbiased10theJGM16 dager sidenWell there goes Rotten Tomatoes’ credibility...no longer using them to judge movies in the futureLeila Békélé16 dager sidenThe blue ticks media is pissed the general public is not buying on their anti-MJ propaganda . Chappelle got a 0% from the media because of his MJ stance .SHWwoooosshh17 dager sidenChapelle would probably invest in your news ideaRoger Edgerton17 dager sidenIt wasn't a particularly good special, imo, and I've loved Chappelle's work for decades.JJ Villy17 dager sidenIt is because be told some truth. He was not politically correct like they want. They try to control your speech. If you don’t believe and like what they want you to say they try to end you. It’s called a Dictatorship!!!Low Budget Series17 dager sidenI can't wait for Dave to comment on this on his next special!!Matty Ward17 dager sidenFuck I swear if this stops Dave wanting to do another stand up ...I think we all just beat up these progressive dickheads with no sense of humour ..they all want us to be sad and dramatic and victimised these days .. I always respect and admire people that have hardships but just laugh it off and are awesome fun people , people that sit around asking for special treatment , yelling and being sad .. don't make me wanna be round emTony Richengod18 dager sidenRotten Tomatoes is wack anyway. Nobody that's got any intelligence listens to them anyways. They just mad because Dave said....that word....what was it?...Oh yeah. FAGGOT!!Truth Seeker19 dager sidenNo, to quote my friend Kyle, it's not activism, it's WacktivismMarvin Light19 dager sidenRotten tomatoes in uk sky news -bbc - guardian news paper channel 4 cnn all irrelevant just crazy leftist bias don’t ever listen to themThe Undead Mage19 dager sidenCheck our the BNN over at rangerup, its a relatively good sourceDarkstar 30319 dager sidenGet Chapelle onThe Guy19 dager sidenOh yeah because they can't cancel Dave Chapell! 😆 NO! They could cancel ANYONE they want and get away with it. Its not politically incorrect for blacks to say politically incorrect things. Political correctness generally only applies to Whites and more so for White men. There are exceptions(not the kinds black conservatives would think), but thats because different things are politically incorrect for different people. What's politically incorrect for Whites to say isn't necessarily the same as whats politically incorrect for blacks to say. Maybe early in the game it was a little different, but the game changes...and changes much faster than the general public can keep up with. Pay more attention to what platform they are on rather than what the person is saying. If they seem based its because they are controlled opposition. But, if you even had Netflix account to begin with than its not like you'd understand 😆J D19 dager sidenCNN? Haha a shit show and waste of time.tasman_devil20 dager sidenWell done and eloquently put. The problem is also that you actually have to pay for real media, real opinions. And after that you have to invest time and effort into it. Free media in this respect is killing it: short titles, prepared narratives, spoon feeding.Tommy Hammernots20 dager sidenIt wasn’t his best.da don20 dager sidenI didn't find it funny within minutes he was telling pedo jokes and it sounded like he was justifying it.. me and my mate make rape jokes all the time but we turned it off after 15-20 minutesHisham Banafa20 dager sidenWow. Progressives are dumb.Agentxphile21 dag sidenI wish we could know who those 5 wokeshits were. Just to see if it matches my imagination of them lolol. They don't even have the guts to come out and say why they gave it a 0%.Sunny Thymes21 dag sidenResearch:: VENUS PROJECT AND ZEITGEIST MOVEMENT ✌💮🤗🔉🍃💖💖💖😊👍deva tvtube21 dag sidenFuk rotten tomatoesWildhare on The Gulf of Mexico21 dag sidenSensibilities....gone in this time.Wild Man21 dag sidenGet Lee Stranahan on.Spartan21 dag sidenBlack males are the white males of the blacksJ Merk21 dag sidenNice clip!justin miller21 dag sidenThis is why i don't use rotten tomatoes for a nonbias truth. It's liberal and should be destroyed.Ramiro Gandolfo22 dager siden"For whatever reaaaasoooon..." A cmon Joe, you know the reason.poodtang222 dager sidenCNN ( Clinton News Network ) The most trusted name in bullshit.Bobby Hood22 dager sidenThe leftists liberal agenda doesn't understand that no one cares what they like or think their arrogance is a insult to the American people, if you disagree with them all they do is call you names!Carla Koala22 dager sidenI found it hilaruousDrew .Watkins23 dager sidenRotten Tomatoes critics simply review media based on the political/social agenda displayed. Not entertainment value. For a lot of people, the entertainment value plays a huge role, which is why there is a huge discrepancy between the critics and public.TwoPercentEmpire23 dager sidenExcellent.Dan Customer24 dager sidenRotten tomatoes is run by an ex Disney president same with Fandango it's no longer a reliable source for movies or TV !RamsesReturns24 dager siden“I subscribe to the Washington Post and New York Times because they have valuable contributions?” What, in the arts? Valuable to who? Seeking truth is a personal journey, and it’s getting harder, as NOplayer, google etc are eliminating the small independent sources front searches... but you still have to search on your own.