Joe Rogan | Chappelle's New Special Had 0% on Rotten Tomatoes

Taken from JRE #1346 w/Zuby:


  1. marcusgeraint


    Dag siden

    I didnt find it funny. Not because I'm left right black white male female gay straight animal mineral film book car bicycle quiche lego. But because I just didnt find it funny. And that's fine.

  2. Trevor Lambert

    Trevor Lambert

    Dag siden

    Never heard of this Zuby guy, but he's very well spoken and makes some insightful comments.

  3. Clown Around

    Clown Around

    Dag siden

    Rotten tomatoes is LGBT biased.

  4. jefar amoose

    jefar amoose

    Dag siden

    It was awesome

  5. mike newbury

    mike newbury

    Dag siden

    The guardian in the UK is an extreme left wing fake-newspaper

  6. calmbbaer


    2 dager siden

    This take seems off to me. Looking at Internet Archive, the earliest five critics (those reviewing the show in August) gave it negative reviews, ergo the 0%. At the time, the site claimed "no critical consensus" due to the small number of reviews. But the sixth (written on September 3), was positive, as were a number of subsequent September reviews, bring it up to 35%. There wasn't any Rotten Tomatoes conspiracy to "have it reviewed by five super-progressive critics." They just took what existed at that point in time. The site also changed its audience review system back in May to try to prevent invalid reviews. Although I'm not sure, that might explain why there were a few days between the show's debut and when the first audience reviews trickled in. (This change was in response to people "reviewing" Captain Marvel before it was released in theaters. Say what you will about the various controversies surrounding that film, but it does seem fair to prevent people who obviously haven't seen something from reviewing it.) You might then ask why those five critics disliked it - whether it was due to politics, sensitivity, or something else - but presenting it as some conspiracy to silence Chappelle misses the point completely and makes him out as some sort of victim rather than someone who made a show that some critics just didn't like. Diverging critical and audience scores are a fact of life - especially with the audience self-selecting to the extent they do on Netflix - not evidence that there's some organized effort to silence non-elitist opinion. Perhaps critics should better represent the opinion of the average moviegoer, but we've long known that they just don't. One last thing: Rotten Tomatoes reminds me of a scene from a 90s sitcom where a reviewer expresses disgust that their review should get boiled down to the position of a digit on one's hand, i.e., "thumbs up" or "thumbs down." If anyone can remember which show it was, they'll answer a question burning at the back of my mind for two decades....

  7. Son Of Songhai

    Son Of Songhai

    2 dager siden

    I watched it several times. It was hilarious 😂

  8. Johann Ertz

    Johann Ertz

    3 dager siden

    Rotten Tomatoes tried to take down Dave Chappelle. Instead, they took themselves down.

  9. Stephen James the 28th

    Stephen James the 28th

    6 dager siden

    Love Dave Chapelle’s work (especially his previous work(only his previous work) until this. I’ll be honest Joe, I’m heavily influenced by your speak and I do recall very recently you saying his most recent standup was a dive. I didn’t fully check it out (looks like I saved myself all kinds of minutes) because I just watched a snippet of the ‘racism’ thing. I was blown away at how poor in quality it was, especially given the bar he has set himself with his previous amazing work (to which has made us all lovers of his material). I found this, I ask a question (haven’t done the research): does he choose a location where there is deprevation regarding racism for example. I found myself thinking the crowd were bursting out in fits of tears yet I wasn’t. I get you pay a decent price for a ticket so enjoy as much as possible, to maximise your purchase. But man common, this in comparison to his other shows, in my opinion (call it naieve being an English white guy living in a very non-non-non racially scared place) trash. I love the guys work. I expected a whole lot better, I may have to watch the whole shabooom rather than judge after a brief clip but nah I can tell. Man must up his game. Bless him; maybe the dark times have got to his creativity. Keep up the great work Joe 👌💙

  10. Payback Gaming

    Payback Gaming

    6 dager siden

    Never forget the loud minority doesn't represent the silent majority! Let those 5 wannabe critics bark for attention! The silent majority loves chapelle and know how important he is for comedy!

  11. Zain Ashiq

    Zain Ashiq

    7 dager siden

    Rogan u gotta get Dave on if he’s up for it

  12. Kawerau Woods

    Kawerau Woods

    8 dager siden

    Hollywood hates Chapelle because he walked away from their $50 million. They wanted another black caricature who they could control and he said no to that and their money. Since then the've been denigrating him. They says he flipped out at one of his comedy events. They say he's checked himself into a mental facility in South Africa. They say his comedy is homophobic, racist etc. They say he's comedy is failing and he's lost his touch... Yet Chapelle keeps winning and they hate that.

  13. richard crago

    richard crago

    8 dager siden

    even the New York Times and Washington Post are full of bullshit, Joe ... it's so sad what's happened to corporate media

  14. Cheez


    10 dager siden

    Usually when I see obvious clickbait I avoid the video almost to a sense of boycotting because it's usually untruthful or stuffed with filler shit. imo.

  15. Jake Garcia_0z

    Jake Garcia_0z

    11 dager siden


  16. HollyTree


    11 dager siden

    While 32% on rotten tomatoes is a little too extreme, ultimately this was not Dave’s best work. Mostly lazy jokes and half hearted delivery. Bill Burr talked about similar stuff and he did a great job - got a 87% on rotten tomatoes. Most critics don’t shit on something just because they don’t agree with it, they’re gauging a lot of factors.

  17. Stephen Croteau

    Stephen Croteau

    14 dager siden

    There should be a news network with half left wing journalists and half right wing journalists (not far right or far left, as balanced and reasonable as possible). They definitely need to be as unbiased in their reporting as possible but that doesn't matter as much because my idea is to send two reporters, one from each side, and send them both to cover the same story getting as many different opinions as possible and then sitting down with each other and discussing, not what they think, but what the story is and the different opinions that each side has in the debate. The best way to properly inform someone is to give them all the important information (not your opinions) and let them work it out for themselves. Inform them of where a bias may be and they will adjust their outcomes accordingly. I say people are stupid, but we're just mostly stupid, there are still intelligent people in the world and they need to be properly informed to, in turn, inform the stupid among them.

  18. Ed Kendrick

    Ed Kendrick

    14 dager siden


  19. Michael McNeill

    Michael McNeill

    14 dager siden

    The Washington Post & The New York Times are reliable sources?

  20. Kerry Boytzun

    Kerry Boytzun

    15 dager siden

    Joe wants to find someone with an accurate analysis of the human condition. Michael Tsarion delves into the psychology and philosophy of the people behind the curtain so to speak, from present day to ancient history.

  21. zendogbreath


    15 dager siden

    Joe Rogan, please put Del Bigtree on with Peter Hotez.

  22. ETX Sports

    ETX Sports

    15 dager siden


  23. J G

    J G

    15 dager siden

    Joe you are the guy.

  24. Nico DeGregorio

    Nico DeGregorio

    16 dager siden

    A Liberal and a Conservative Debate Sticks and Stones:

  25. Janiter Inadrum

    Janiter Inadrum

    16 dager siden


  26. Janiter Inadrum

    Janiter Inadrum

    16 dager siden

    Did that guy just say that he thought CNN was unbiased

  27. 10theJGM


    16 dager siden

    Well there goes Rotten Tomatoes’ longer using them to judge movies in the future

  28. Leila Békélé

    Leila Békélé

    16 dager siden

    The blue ticks media is pissed the general public is not buying on their anti-MJ propaganda . Chappelle got a 0% from the media because of his MJ stance .

  29. SHWwoooosshh


    17 dager siden

    Chapelle would probably invest in your news idea

  30. Roger Edgerton

    Roger Edgerton

    17 dager siden

    It wasn't a particularly good special, imo, and I've loved Chappelle's work for decades.

  31. JJ Villy

    JJ Villy

    17 dager siden

    It is because be told some truth. He was not politically correct like they want. They try to control your speech. If you don’t believe and like what they want you to say they try to end you. It’s called a Dictatorship!!!

  32. Low Budget Series

    Low Budget Series

    17 dager siden

    I can't wait for Dave to comment on this on his next special!!

  33. Matty Ward

    Matty Ward

    17 dager siden

    Fuck I swear if this stops Dave wanting to do another stand up ...I think we all just beat up these progressive dickheads with no sense of humour ..they all want us to be sad and dramatic and victimised these days .. I always respect and admire people that have hardships but just laugh it off and are awesome fun people , people that sit around asking for special treatment , yelling and being sad .. don't make me wanna be round em

  34. Tony Richengod

    Tony Richengod

    18 dager siden

    Rotten Tomatoes is wack anyway. Nobody that's got any intelligence listens to them anyways. They just mad because Dave said....that word....what was it?...Oh yeah. FAGGOT!!

  35. Truth Seeker

    Truth Seeker

    19 dager siden

    No, to quote my friend Kyle, it's not activism, it's Wacktivism

  36. Marvin Light

    Marvin Light

    19 dager siden

    Rotten tomatoes in uk sky news -bbc - guardian news paper channel 4 cnn all irrelevant just crazy leftist bias don’t ever listen to them

  37. The Undead Mage

    The Undead Mage

    19 dager siden

    Check our the BNN over at rangerup, its a relatively good source

  38. Darkstar 303

    Darkstar 303

    19 dager siden

    Get Chapelle on

  39. The Guy

    The Guy

    19 dager siden

    Oh yeah because they can't cancel Dave Chapell! 😆 NO! They could cancel ANYONE they want and get away with it. Its not politically incorrect for blacks to say politically incorrect things. Political correctness generally only applies to Whites and more so for White men. There are exceptions(not the kinds black conservatives would think), but thats because different things are politically incorrect for different people. What's politically incorrect for Whites to say isn't necessarily the same as whats politically incorrect for blacks to say. Maybe early in the game it was a little different, but the game changes...and changes much faster than the general public can keep up with. Pay more attention to what platform they are on rather than what the person is saying. If they seem based its because they are controlled opposition. But, if you even had Netflix account to begin with than its not like you'd understand 😆

  40. J D

    J D

    19 dager siden

    CNN? Haha a shit show and waste of time.

  41. tasman_devil


    20 dager siden

    Well done and eloquently put. The problem is also that you actually have to pay for real media, real opinions. And after that you have to invest time and effort into it. Free media in this respect is killing it: short titles, prepared narratives, spoon feeding.

  42. Tommy Hammernots

    Tommy Hammernots

    20 dager siden

    It wasn’t his best.

  43. da don

    da don

    20 dager siden

    I didn't find it funny within minutes he was telling pedo jokes and it sounded like he was justifying it.. me and my mate make rape jokes all the time but we turned it off after 15-20 minutes

  44. Hisham Banafa

    Hisham Banafa

    20 dager siden

    Wow. Progressives are dumb.

  45. Agentxphile


    21 dag siden

    I wish we could know who those 5 wokeshits were. Just to see if it matches my imagination of them lolol. They don't even have the guts to come out and say why they gave it a 0%.

  46. Sunny Thymes

    Sunny Thymes

    21 dag siden


  47. deva tvtube

    deva tvtube

    21 dag siden

    Fuk rotten tomatoes

  48. Wildhare on The Gulf of Mexico

    Wildhare on The Gulf of Mexico

    21 dag siden

    Sensibilities....gone in this time.

  49. Wild Man

    Wild Man

    21 dag siden

    Get Lee Stranahan on.

  50. Spartan


    21 dag siden

    Black males are the white males of the blacks

  51. J Merk

    J Merk

    21 dag siden

    Nice clip!

  52. justin miller

    justin miller

    21 dag siden

    This is why i don't use rotten tomatoes for a nonbias truth. It's liberal and should be destroyed.

  53. Ramiro Gandolfo

    Ramiro Gandolfo

    22 dager siden

    "For whatever reaaaasoooon..." A cmon Joe, you know the reason.

  54. poodtang2


    22 dager siden

    CNN ( Clinton News Network ) The most trusted name in bullshit.

  55. Bobby Hood

    Bobby Hood

    22 dager siden

    The leftists liberal agenda doesn't understand that no one cares what they like or think their arrogance is a insult to the American people, if you disagree with them all they do is call you names!

  56. Carla Koala

    Carla Koala

    22 dager siden

    I found it hilaruous

  57. Drew .Watkins

    Drew .Watkins

    23 dager siden

    Rotten Tomatoes critics simply review media based on the political/social agenda displayed. Not entertainment value. For a lot of people, the entertainment value plays a huge role, which is why there is a huge discrepancy between the critics and public.

  58. TwoPercentEmpire


    23 dager siden


  59. Dan Customer

    Dan Customer

    24 dager siden

    Rotten tomatoes is run by an ex Disney president same with Fandango it's no longer a reliable source for movies or TV !

  60. RamsesReturns


    24 dager siden

    “I subscribe to the Washington Post and New York Times because they have valuable contributions?” What, in the arts? Valuable to who? Seeking truth is a personal journey, and it’s getting harder, as NOplayer, google etc are eliminating the small independent sources front searches... but you still have to search on your own.